This online discussion explores the nature of justice and equality in society. Participants engage in a thought-provoking debate about whether current economic systems are truly fair, or if we need to reimagine and redefine concepts like wealth, success, and even “justice.” Some argue that we should focus on access to resources and opportunities rather than simply dividing existing wealth.

The conversation explores various perspectives:

Arguments against "revolutionary" change:

• Some participants believe that violent uprising is not the answer, while others suggest that simply changing definitions might be insufficient. They argue for a more systematic approach to addressing social inequality and emphasize focusing on access to resources rather than redefining wealth or success.

Arguments for redefining justice:

Participants like عهد الكيلاني believe we need to redefine fundamental concepts like "justice" and "equality." They argue that simply changing the distribution of wealth won't solve all problems, and that we need a new vision for society.

Concerns about systemic issues:

Some participants express concerns about the potential for manipulation within any system. They question whether redefining terms like "justice" can truly create change if underlying inequalities remain.

Call for practical solutions:

The discussion ends without a definitive answer, but leaves readers to ponder on what it really means to be just and equitable in today's society.